Saturday, July 16, 2011

Article Database - When A Good Thing Is Copied

Article Database - When A Good Thing Is Copied


Article Database may be the title of my article directory and i believe the title I've selected for this states everything.

I might be wrong in feeling the requirement to write this short article. It's possible what they are called much like those of my website were developed first or completely without getting seen mine however, I'm correct In my opinion which i have valid reason to create this short article.

Maybe you have seen how people copycat the prosperity of others? This is a type of practice on the web. A just to illustrate might be my article directory Article Database.

I began my article directory Article Database at http://world wide web.article-database.com in mid to late The month of january of 2006 by late March received a Google PR rank of three for world wide web.article-database.com and PR4 for world wide web.article-database.com/news/. I've since done searches and that i can certainly find my website when searching Google for article-database. However, to locate Article Database appears to become a little harder.

It seems in my experience that after people wish to improve their Search engine optimization they're going searching for website names which have already received a PR from Google and continue to take advantage of that websites success. I'm not tolerant of this but I do think that articledatabase.org came after article-database.com because it is also copyrighted with 2006. They might convey more articles than I actually do. Did they really get these solicited and released towards the site directly through the authors? I'm not stating that they did not however they might have added the articles themselves. That may explain why by June 14, 2006 they don't show a Google PR that belongs to them.

Such can also be the situation with articles-database.com. I don't know once they released and perhaps these were before me however i am wondering why they've no Google PR? The only real difference within the Link to their website and mine is they used the term articles instead of article.

I attribute my PR ranking to a lot of things. The very first could well be which i went a publicity release utilizing a popular publicity release software. Next I discovered some authors and approached them and began receiving authors adding straight to my website. Following this there have been several articles on the website, and so i posted the nourishes from the groups most abundant in articles to probably the most popular nourishes for example MyYahoo, Newsgator, Google, and many more. Then i produced a WordPress blog about writing and article promotion, and posted it to many blog sites and feed sites. I Quickly began making posts your blog on the semi-consistent basis. The authors who lead to Article Database will also be informed when new content is published. Additionally I personally use exactly the same software to transmit a e-newsletter to everybody that has registered being an author or user of my system. I additionally published articles to many article sites which i entitled Article Sites - Ten Great Good Reasons To Submit Articles For Them.

Am I worrying about other article sites getting exactly the same title as mine? I do not believe that i'm worrying rather I'm just mentioning the strange proven fact that when someone sees something working they frequently attempt to copy it, which is much more than true on the web. Frequently an internet site title or URL is built to be similar to be able to get some form of internet search engine advantage or the advantages of potential misspellings from the original website.

In my opinion that during my own way, I'm stating that if these along with other websites saw the Google PR of my blog and made the decision to title their article directory after mine, I'm guessing because the sincerest type of flattery. I am certain that someone in cyberland will grab up other domain names based on the terms article database. I'm glad that i'm among the first.

No comments:

Post a Comment